Meaning of Tao
Note: you need to register to comment.
Tao is only a name, it is a name outside of duality, it is the one thing with no anti, no, or opposite. The name Tao was given to the "unnameable" unwillingly by the first person to use the term, Lau Tzu. Lau Tzu did not wish to name Tao at all but was in a corner do do so as he was writing a book. Giving names causes problems and some chapters point to just that. So the name is just an aspect of language and not anything in itself.
Tao is an all embracing concept; which, due to its nature, can not be put into words. Therefore the first line anyone reads from the most famous book on the Tao "The Tao Te Ching" is something like "The Tao that can be told is not the Tao", the book then goes on to give a furthur 80 short enlightening verses pointing towards the Tao.
No thing or description is the Tao yet nothing is independant of the Tao. Think "There is all that is, so there must be all that isn't" -The Tao is both of those. And the term is simply the unnameable, non-dual, "it".
Tao almost equates to Interdependance mixed with an idea of motion - yet is neither. Motion could not exist without stillness, and nothing with properties can exist without something without those properties - the Tao has no properties yet contains them all - words fail it!
The Tao Te Ching is essential reading. Get an audio book free from here. and Alan Watts talks of the Lao Tzu. Plus Tao of Jeet Kune Do Bruce Lee
This may be unclear to newcomers but Tao is not a religion. Taoism is a religion and is probably the hardest to pin down as anything from Chinese life, simplicity, the arrangement of a house, and more, can all be called Taoism. I am open to the good in all but do not follow a religion as I find they are exclusive and thereby restrictive of ones true nature.
"I let go of religion,
and people become serene."
"When they lose their sense of awe,
people turn to religion."
Tao therefore is a philosophy or a way of thinking - it can be used by anyone non-exclusively; It is the notion of seeing from the center, seeing that all points exist do to polar complementaries (not opposites). Things exist due to the notion of an opposite yet are complementary, mutually arising, in total interdependence of each other.
Often explained by the idea of a Clay Pot - the pot, decorated or not, is seen to be that part of value. Yet if it were not empty, it would have no use.
Here I would like to encourage modern, plain talking, about the Tao; how it relates to us now, and not the "ye olde" translations unless they carry direct relation to life now.